9 Best LLM Observability Tools of 2026
By the TopToolAdvisor research desk · Updated November 12, 2026 · Next review December 27, 2026 · 9 products scored
Our pick in brief
Langfuse is the best all-round pick: open source, self-hostable, and $29 a month for a cloud plan with unlimited users. LangSmith has the broadest feature set and is the obvious choice on LangChain or LangGraph. Braintrust leads on evaluation workflows but costs $249 a month for Pro. Arize pairs a hosted platform with the open-source Phoenix, and Comet Opik is the cheapest paid plan at $19. Helicone adds a gateway with caching, Datadog fits existing Datadog shops, Pydantic Logfire covers AI and app monitoring on one meter, and W&B Weave suits teams already on Weights & Biases.
Quick answer
Langfuse is the best LLM observability tool for engineering teams in 2026 because it is open source and its Core plan costs $29 a month with unlimited users; LangSmith suits teams building on LangChain or LangGraph at $39 per seat a month. Comet Opik is the cheapest paid option at $19 a month, and Langfuse, Opik, Arize AX and Helicone all have free plans, as of November 2026. Companies already on Datadog should look at Datadog Agent Observability, which starts free and runs $160 a month on an annual Pro commitment.
This list is for engineering teams that need to see what their LLM apps and agents are doing in production: tracing each call and tool step, scoring outputs with evals, tracking token costs and alerting on regressions. We compared documented features and published prices for 9 tools and scored each on features, ease of use and value. Prices are the cheapest paid plan in US dollars as shown on the vendor's pricing page on November 12, 2026. Most of these tools also meter usage by traces, spans, records or gigabytes, so the entry price is only the starting point. We left out Humanloop, which is joining Anthropic, and Galileo, whose pricing page now redirects to Splunk.
By the numbers
- 19.8%In the U.S. Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey period ending May 3, 2026, 19.8% of U.S. firms reported using AI in their business functions.Source: U.S. Census Bureau
- 19.95%In 2025, 19.95% of EU enterprises with 10 or more employees used at least one AI technology, according to Eurostat.Source: Eurostat
- 55.03%In 2025, 55.03% of large EU enterprises (250 or more employees) used AI, compared with 30.36% of medium and 17% of small enterprises, per Eurostat.Source: Eurostat
- 62.52%In 2025, 62.52% of EU enterprises in information and communication used AI, the highest of any sector, followed by professional, scientific and technical services at 40.43%.Source: Eurostat
- 55.9%In September 2026, 55.9% of U.S. businesses on Ramp's spend platform paid for AI models, subscriptions or APIs, up 12.1 points from a year earlier.Source: Ramp
- 2%AI spending is concentrated: 2% of firms accounted for over 50% of total AI spending in the 2026 NBER executive survey.Source: National Bureau of Economic Research
Shortlist scores
- 1Langfuseengineering teams that want open-source tracing with a cheap cloud plan9.0
- 2LangSmithteams building agents with LangChain or LangGraph8.9
- 3Arize AX and Phoenixteams that want OpenTelemetry tracing with an open-source option8.7
- 4BraintrustAI product teams that run evals before every release8.7
- 5Comet Opiksmall teams that want an open-source tool with a low cloud price8.6
- 6Datadog Agent Observabilitycompanies that already run Datadog APM and logs8.4
- 7Heliconeteams that want request logging and a gateway in one setup8.4
- 8Pydantic LogfirePython teams that want AI and app monitoring in one tool8.3
- 9W&B WeaveML teams already tracking experiments in Weights & Biases8.2
How the scores work
Each product is rated out of 10 on the same three criteria, then ranked by the weighted total. Scores compare documented features and published prices, not hands-on testing.
- 35%Features
- 35%Ease of use
- 30%Value
No. 1, our pick
LangfuseOpen-source AI engineering platform for tracing, prompt management, evaluation and metrics, available as Langfuse Cloud or self-hosted.
9.0of 10Best for engineering teams that want open-source tracing with a cheap cloud plan
- Features
- 9.1
- Ease of use
- 8.7
- Value
- 9.3
Price
Free Hobby plan; Core from $29 a month with unlimited users; Pro $199 a month
Quoted from the Langfuse pricing page on November 12, 2026:
For production projects. Longer data access and unlimited users. $29 / month
Langfuse ranks first because it pairs a full tracing, prompt and evaluation stack with the lowest paid entry price in this list among tools that include unlimited users. Its documentation describes it as an open-source AI engineering platform that is self-hostable, and the docs include setup guides for Docker Compose, Kubernetes with Helm and Terraform on the three big clouds. On Langfuse Cloud, the Hobby plan is free with 50k units a month and 30 days of data access for 2 users. Core costs $29 a month, includes 100k units and 90 days of data, and has no seat cap, which matters for teams where product managers and reviewers need access too. Pro at $199 adds 3 years of data access, unlimited annotation queues and SOC2 and ISO27001 reports. The trade-off is that enterprise identity features sit in a $300 a month Teams add-on, and heavy tracing volumes are billed at $8 per 100k units beyond the allowance.
Strengths
- +Hobby plan is free with 50k units a month and no credit card
- +Core at $29 a month already includes unlimited users and 100k units
- +The open-source code can run in your own infrastructure
Drawbacks
- −Hobby keeps only 30 days of data and allows 2 users
- −Enterprise SSO and fine-grained RBAC need the $300 a month Teams add-on on Pro
- −Usage beyond the included 100k units costs $8 per 100k units
- Free plan
- Hobby, 50k units a month, 30 days of data, 2 users
- Cheapest paid plan
- Core, $29 a month, 100k units, 90 days of data
- Overage
- $8 per 100k units, lower with volume
- Hosting
- Langfuse Cloud or self-hosted
No. 2
LangSmithLangChain's platform for agent tracing, monitoring, online and offline evals, plus deployment and an LLM gateway.
8.9of 10Best for teams building agents with LangChain or LangGraph
- Features
- 9.3
- Ease of use
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Free Developer plan for 1 seat; Plus $39 per seat a month plus pay as you go
Quoted from the LangSmith pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Plus For teams building and deploying agents. $39 / seat per month
LangSmith comes second on the strength of its feature set. The observability page lists native tracing for agent frameworks and OpenTelemetry, SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go and Java, message threading for multi-turn chats, online LLM-as-judge and code evals, trajectory monitoring and alerts through webhooks or PagerDuty. Insights clusters traces to show common behaviors and failure modes without manual tagging. The free Developer plan covers 1 seat and 5k base traces a month. Plus costs $39 per seat a month with 10k base traces, and extra traces are billed in LangChain Standard Units at 0.005 LSU each. The same account also covers agent deployment, sandboxes and an LLM gateway with cost controls and PII redaction. Value scores lower than Langfuse because seat pricing adds up for larger teams, and self-hosting needs an Enterprise contract.
Strengths
- +Developer plan is free with 5k base traces a month
- +Covers observability, evals, agent deployment and sandboxes under one account
- +Startups backed by VCs can get up to $10,000 in credits
Drawbacks
- −Plus is priced per seat at $39, so costs grow with team size
- −The free Developer plan is limited to 1 seat
- −Self-hosted and hybrid options are only on Enterprise
- Free plan
- Developer, 1 seat, 5k base traces a month
- Plus
- $39 per seat a month, 10k base traces included
- Extra traces
- 0.005 LSU per trace, at $1.00 per LSU
- Data location
- US or EU cloud
No. 3
Arize AX and PhoenixArize AX is a hosted AI observability and evaluation platform; Phoenix is Arize's open-source tracing and eval tool you can run locally.
8.7of 10Best for teams that want OpenTelemetry tracing with an open-source option
- Features
- 9.0
- Ease of use
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.8
Price
AX Free with 25k spans a month; AX Pro $50 a month; Phoenix open source is free
Quoted from the Arize AX and Phoenix pricing page on November 12, 2026:
AX Pro For AI-native teams $50 per month
Arize earns fourth place with two ways in. Phoenix is open source and can run locally or be self-hosted, which suits teams that want to start tracing without a vendor account. Arize AX is the hosted platform, and its pricing page lists OpenTelemetry compliant tracing, token, latency and cost tracking, online evals on traces and spans, trace evals for agent trajectories and session evals for multi-turn conversations, plus multi-modal tracing for image, voice and PDF. AX Free gives unlimited users, evals and experiments with 25k spans, 1 GB and 15 days of retention. AX Pro costs $50 a month for 50k spans, 10 GB and 30 days. Data can sit in the US, EU or Canada. Ease of use scores a little lower because teams have to choose between two products and move between them as needs grow, and self-hosted AX, SSO and audit logs all wait for Enterprise.
Strengths
- +Unlimited users, evals and experiments on the free AX plan
- +AX Pro at $50 a month raises spans to 50k and storage to 10 GB
- +Data regions in the US, EU or Canada
Drawbacks
- −AX Free keeps data for only 15 days
- −Self-hosted AX deployment requires Enterprise
- −Enterprise SSO and audit logs are not in Free or Pro
- Free plan
- AX Free, 25k spans, 1 GB, 15-day retention
- AX Pro
- $50 a month, 50k spans, 10 GB, 30-day retention
- Open source
- Phoenix, run locally or self-host
- Data region
- US, EU or CA
No. 4
BraintrustEvaluation and observability platform for AI products with tracing, scorers, playgrounds, experiments and a gateway.
8.7of 10Best for AI product teams that run evals before every release
- Features
- 9.2
- Ease of use
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.0
Price
Free Starter plan with unlimited users; Pro $249 a month
Quoted from the Braintrust pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Pro For AI native teams $249 / month
Braintrust ranks third because its evaluation workflow is the most complete here. The docs organize the product around instrumenting, observing, annotating, evaluating and deploying, with evaluators, playgrounds, experiments, remote evals and online scoring of production traffic. Every plan includes unlimited users, projects, datasets and experiments, so a whole team can join for free on Starter, which includes 1 GB of processed data, 10k scores and 14-day retention. Pro costs $249 a month and adds $100 of model credits, 5 GB of processed data, 50k scores, 30-day retention, custom charts, environments and RBAC. Overage on Pro is $3 per GB and $1.50 per 1,000 scores. The price of Pro is what holds its value score back: a small team that only needs tracing pays less with Langfuse or Opik. Startups should check the 6 to 12 month free Pro offer first.
Strengths
- +Starter is free with unlimited users, 1 GB of processed data and 10k scores
- +Pro includes $100 of model credits a month
- +Qualifying startups can get 6 to 12 months of Pro free
Drawbacks
- −Pro costs $249 a month, the highest flat entry price on this list
- −Starter keeps data for only 14 days
- −SAML SSO and a BAA require Enterprise
- Free plan
- Starter, 1 GB processed data, 10k scores, 14-day retention
- Pro
- $249 a month, 5 GB processed data, 50k scores
- Overage
- $3 per GB and $1.50 per 1,000 scores on Pro
- Users
- Unlimited on all plans
No. 5
Comet OpikComet's open-source platform for AI application tracing, test suites, evaluation and an agent playground, with free and paid cloud plans.
8.6of 10Best for small teams that want an open-source tool with a low cloud price
- Features
- 8.5
- Ease of use
- 8.3
- Value
- 9.2
Price
Open source and Free Cloud at $0; Pro Cloud $19 a month for up to 50 team members
Quoted from the Comet Opik pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Expanded usage for teams $19 Per month
Comet Opik is the best-value pick on this list. The pricing page says the open-source edition shares the same codebase as the hosted versions and includes agent tracing, test suites and the agent playground. Free Cloud covers up to 10 team members, 25k spans a month and 60-day retention, which is longer than the free tiers from Langfuse, Arize or Braintrust. Pro Cloud costs $19 a month for up to 50 team members and 100k spans, with customizable span limits and retention. The feature list includes execution graphs, sessions, cost tracking, test suites with assertions, 30+ built-in metrics, annotation queues and integrations with 40+ frameworks, providers and gateways. It scores lower on features than the top three because production alerting and analytics are less extensive in its published plan comparison, and the Ollie coding assistant requires buying tokens after the trial.
Strengths
- +Free Cloud covers up to 10 team members and 25k spans with 60-day retention
- +Pro Cloud at $19 a month is the lowest paid price on this list
- +The open-source edition uses the same codebase as the hosted versions
Drawbacks
- −Pro Cloud includes 100k spans a month, so busy apps need custom limits
- −The Ollie assistant needs purchased tokens after a free trial
- −SSO and compliance packages are Enterprise only
- Free Cloud
- Up to 10 members, 25k spans a month, 60-day retention
- Pro Cloud
- $19 a month, up to 50 members, 100k spans
- Open source
- Same codebase as hosted versions
- Integrations
- 40+ frameworks, providers and gateways
No. 6
Datadog Agent ObservabilityDatadog's product for tracing, evaluating and monitoring AI agents, sold inside the wider Datadog platform.
8.4of 10Best for companies that already run Datadog APM and logs
- Features
- 9.0
- Ease of use
- 8.2
- Value
- 7.8
Price
Free tier up to 40K LLM spans a month; Pro from $160 a month on an annual commitment
Quoted from the Datadog Agent Observability pricing page on November 12, 2026:
The Pro tier starts at $240 per month on-demand for the first 100K LLM spans, with lower rates at $200 per month month-to-month and $160 per month on an annual commitment.
Datadog now sells its LLM tracing product as Agent Observability, and it makes the most sense for teams already paying for Datadog. The product page says it runs the same Datadog tracer from development through production and correlates agent behavior with backend performance and end-user impact, which standalone tools cannot do on their own. Billing counts only LLM spans, so tool, workflow and retrieval spans are free. The free tier allows up to 40K LLM spans a month with 15-day retention and unlimited evaluations. Pro covers 100K LLM spans for $160 a month on an annual commitment, $200 month-to-month or $240 on-demand, with extra spans from $3.50 per 10K. Sensitive Data Scanner is included to redact personal, financial and health data. Value scores lowest here because longer retention costs $6.50 to $9 per 10K spans, and teams new to Datadog face a larger platform to learn.
Strengths
- +Free tier includes up to 40K LLM spans with unlimited evaluations
- +Traces connect to the rest of an existing Datadog stack
- +HIPAA compliance and role-based access control are listed features
Drawbacks
- −Pro costs $240 a month on-demand, dropping to $160 only with an annual commitment
- −Free tier keeps traces for 15 days
- −Longer retention costs $6.50 to $9 per 10K LLM spans a month
- Free tier
- Up to 40K LLM spans a month, 15-day retention
- Pro
- $160 a month annual, $200 monthly, $240 on-demand for 100K LLM spans
- Extra spans
- $3.50 per 10K annual, $5 on-demand
- Languages
- Python, Node.js, Java, plus HTTP API
Visit datadoghq.com|See the Datadog Agent Observability profile
No. 7
HeliconeOpen-source LLM observability and AI gateway that logs requests, tracks costs and adds caching, rate limits and fallbacks.
8.4of 10Best for teams that want request logging and a gateway in one setup
- Features
- 8.2
- Ease of use
- 8.9
- Value
- 8.2
Price
Free Hobby plan with 10,000 requests; Pro $79 a month plus usage; 7-day free trial
Quoted from the Helicone pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Pro POPULAR $79 per month For growing teams.
Helicone takes a request-first approach. Its docs describe an open-source LLM observability product with an AI gateway that handles provider routing, caching, custom rate limits and fallbacks, so the same setup that records requests can also cut repeat calls. Observability covers sessions, user metrics, cost tracking, custom properties, alerts, reports and HQL, Helicone's query language. Hobby is free with 10,000 requests, 1 GB of storage and 7-day retention for 1 seat. Pro costs $79 a month plus usage, adds unlimited seats, alerts, reports and HQL, and keeps data for 1 month. Team at $799 a month adds 5 organizations, SOC-2 and HIPAA compliance and a dedicated Slack channel. It scores well on ease of use because logging sits in the request path, but its evaluation tools are thinner than those of Braintrust or LangSmith, and the jump from Pro to Team is steep.
Strengths
- +Hobby is free with 10,000 requests and 1 GB of storage
- +Pro includes unlimited seats
- +Startups under 2 years old and $5M in funding get 50% off the first year
Drawbacks
- −Hobby keeps data for 7 days and allows 1 seat
- −SAML SSO and on-prem deployment are Enterprise only
- −Usage-based charges apply on top of the Pro fee
- Free plan
- Hobby, 10,000 requests, 1 GB, 7-day retention
- Pro
- $79 a month plus usage, unlimited seats
- Team
- $799 a month, 5 organizations, SOC-2 and HIPAA
- Free trial
- 7 days on Pro and Team
No. 8
Pydantic LogfireObservability platform from the Pydantic team that covers AI observability, evals, application performance and infrastructure on one record-based meter.
8.3of 10Best for Python teams that want AI and app monitoring in one tool
- Features
- 8.3
- Ease of use
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Free Personal plan with 10M records; Team $49 a month with 5 seats
Quoted from the Pydantic Logfire pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Team $49/mo For small teams shipping their first production workloads.
Pydantic Logfire suits teams whose AI features sit inside a larger Python service. The pricing page describes one record-based meter for AI observability, evals, application performance and infrastructure, so LLM traces and normal application spans land in the same place. Every plan includes 10M records a month, and the free Personal plan is hard-capped at $0 with 3 projects, 30-day retention and 1 seat plus 2 read-only guests. Team costs $49 a month with 5 seats, unlimited agent, service and host monitoring, AI output evaluations and human review, then $2 per million records up to your spending cap. Growth at $249 adds unlimited seats and projects and up to 90-day retention. It ranks below the specialist tools because its evaluation features start only on paid plans and are less detailed in its plan list than in Braintrust or LangSmith, but the spending cap makes costs easy to predict.
Strengths
- +Personal plan is free with 10M records a month, hard-capped at $0
- +Usage is $2 per million records after the allowance, up to a spending cap
- +Growth plan has unlimited seats, guests and projects
Drawbacks
- −Evals and human review are not on the free Personal plan
- −Team includes 5 seats and charges $25 per extra seat
- −Self-hosting requires Enterprise
- Free plan
- Personal, 10M records a month, 3 projects, 30-day retention
- Team
- $49 a month, 5 seats, 10M records included
- Usage
- $2 per million records
- Growth
- $249 a month, unlimited seats, up to 90-day retention
No. 9
W&B WeaveWeights & Biases toolkit for tracing, evaluating and monitoring LLM applications, now sold within CoreWeave Forge plans.
8.2of 10Best for ML teams already tracking experiments in Weights & Biases
- Features
- 8.5
- Ease of use
- 8.0
- Value
- 8.0
Price
Free plan; Pro starts at $60 a month billed monthly with a 30-day free trial
Quoted from the W&B Weave pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Starts at $60/month, billed monthly
W&B Weave is the natural pick for machine learning teams that already use Weights & Biases for training runs, since tracing, evaluation and model experiments share one workspace. The pricing page, now branded CoreWeave Forge, lists tracing that captures inputs, outputs and metadata for each inference, side-by-side comparison of recipes for accuracy, latency and token usage, LLM-as-a-judge metrics, production monitoring and PII redaction. The free plan includes AI application tracing, evaluations and scorers with 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Pro starts at $60 a month billed monthly with a 30-day trial and adds team access controls, CI/CD automations and Slack and email alerts, with 1.5 GB of ingestion. It ranks last because ingestion allowances are small for production tracing, extra data is billed per MB, and Pro is limited to companies with fewer than 50 employees.
Strengths
- +Free plan includes AI application tracing, evaluations and scorers
- +Same account covers model experiment tracking and a registry
- +Pro has a 30-day free trial
Drawbacks
- −Free plan includes only 1 GB a month of Weave data ingestion
- −Extra Weave ingestion is billed per MB
- −Pro is meant for teams under 50 employees; larger companies must move to Enterprise
- Free plan
- Yes, 1 GB a month of Weave ingestion
- Pro
- From $60 a month billed monthly, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
- Free trial
- 30 days on Pro
- Pro eligibility
- Teams under 50 employees
What to check before you buy
Decide whether you need to self-host
If prompts and outputs cannot leave your infrastructure, start with open-source options. Langfuse publishes self-hosting guides for Docker Compose, Kubernetes and Terraform, Arize Phoenix runs locally or self-hosted, Comet Opik's open-source edition shares the hosted codebase, and Helicone documents self-hosting. LangSmith, Arize AX and Logfire offer self-hosting only on Enterprise.
Understand the usage meter
Each vendor meters differently: Langfuse counts units, LangSmith counts traces, Arize and Opik count spans, Datadog counts only LLM spans, Braintrust counts processed GB and scores, Logfire counts records and Weave counts ingested data. Estimate a month of production traffic and price it on each meter before comparing entry prices.
Check seats and retention, not just the base fee
LangSmith Plus charges $39 per seat, while Langfuse Core, Braintrust, Helicone Pro and Arize AX include unlimited users. Free tiers keep data between 7 days (Helicone) and 60 days (Opik), so longer debugging windows usually require a paid plan.
Weigh evaluation depth
If you gate releases on evals, look at experiments, online scoring and human review. Braintrust, LangSmith and Arize AX publish the most detailed evaluation features, while Helicone and Logfire focus more on logging, cost tracking and alerts.
Consider your existing stack
Teams on Datadog can keep agent traces next to APM and logs, teams on LangChain get native tracing in LangSmith, and teams using Weights & Biases for training can keep LLM traces in Weave. Most tools here also accept OpenTelemetry, which makes switching later easier.
Common questions
- What is the best LLM observability tool in 2026?
- Langfuse is our top pick for most engineering teams. It is open source and self-hostable, and its Core cloud plan costs $29 a month with unlimited users and 100k units included. LangSmith ranks second for teams on LangChain or LangGraph.
- Is there a free LLM observability tool?
- Yes. Langfuse Hobby includes 50k units a month, Arize AX Free includes 25k spans, Comet Opik Free Cloud covers 25k spans for up to 10 members, and Datadog's free tier allows up to 40K LLM spans. Arize Phoenix and Opik can also be self-hosted as open source.
- How much does LangSmith cost?
- LangSmith Plus costs $39 per seat a month with 10k base traces included, then pay as you go. The Developer plan is free for 1 seat and 5k base traces a month, according to LangChain's pricing page.
- What is the difference between LLM observability and APM?
- LLM observability records prompts, outputs, token costs and agent steps and scores output quality with evals, while APM tracks service latency, errors and infrastructure. Datadog Agent Observability and Pydantic Logfire cover both in one platform.
- Which LLM observability tools are open source?
- Langfuse, Arize Phoenix, Comet Opik and Helicone are open source. Langfuse documents self-hosting on Docker Compose, Kubernetes and Terraform, and Opik's open-source edition uses the same codebase as its hosted plans.
- What is the cheapest paid LLM observability plan?
- Comet Opik Pro Cloud is the cheapest at $19 a month for up to 50 team members and 100k spans. Langfuse Core follows at $29 a month with unlimited users.
Questions or corrections: editorial@toptooladvisor.com
See our disclosure and editorial policy. Vendors update prices without notice, so confirm on their site first.