10 Best AI Inference Platforms of 2026
By the TopToolAdvisor research desk · Updated November 12, 2026 · Next review December 27, 2026 · 10 products scored
Our pick in brief
Together AI is the best default for most developers: a long serverless catalog, gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens, and a clear path from serverless to provisioned throughput and dedicated GPUs. Fireworks AI matches that gpt-oss-120B price and adds Fast, Priority, Batch and Spot modes you can switch per request, plus HIPAA with a BAA. DeepInfra has the lowest token prices on many DeepSeek, GLM and Qwen models and an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Baseten suits teams that want both day-zero model APIs and per-minute dedicated GPUs. Groq and Cerebras are the speed specialists, with documented rates around 1,000 and 3,000 tokens per second on gpt-oss, but small self-serve catalogs. SambaNova Cloud is a smaller fast-hardware alternative, Modal suits teams deploying their own model code on per-second GPUs, Amazon Bedrock suits AWS shops, and Replicate suits image and video models more than low-latency chat.
Quick answer
Together AI is the best AI inference platform for developers serving open models in 2026, because one OpenAI-compatible API covers serverless per-token models, batch jobs, provisioned throughput and dedicated H100 endpoints at $5.49 per GPU hour. Fireworks AI suits teams that want per-request Fast, Batch and Spot modes on the same endpoint, and DeepInfra is the cheapest option we found, with DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at $0.06 per 1M input tokens as of November 2026. Teams that need the lowest latency on a small set of models should look at Groq or Cerebras, and teams that run their own custom model code should pick Modal or Baseten.
This list is for developers who serve open-weight models such as gpt-oss, DeepSeek, GLM, Qwen and Kimi behind an API and care about latency and per-token cost. We compared documented features and published prices for 10 inference platforms and scored each on features, ease of use and value. Prices are the US dollar rates shown on each vendor's own pricing page or docs when we checked in November 2026. Where a vendor serves gpt-oss-120B we quote that model so you can compare like for like; otherwise we quote the cheapest listed language model or GPU rate, and the price unit is shown next to each figure. We left out Anyscale because its published pricing is per GPU hour for Ray workloads rather than per-token model serving.
By the numbers
- 19.8%In the U.S. Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey period ending May 3, 2026, 19.8% of U.S. firms reported using AI in their business functions.Source: U.S. Census Bureau
- 19.95%In 2025, 19.95% of EU enterprises with 10 or more employees used at least one AI technology, according to Eurostat.Source: Eurostat
- 55.03%In 2025, 55.03% of large EU enterprises (250 or more employees) used AI, compared with 30.36% of medium and 17% of small enterprises, per Eurostat.Source: Eurostat
- 62.52%In 2025, 62.52% of EU enterprises in information and communication used AI, the highest of any sector, followed by professional, scientific and technical services at 40.43%.Source: Eurostat
- $1 trillionIDC forecasts worldwide public cloud services spending will pass $1 trillion in 2026, growing about 21%.Source: IDC
Shortlist scores
- 1Together AIDevelopers who want one vendor from prototype to dedicated GPUs8.9
- 2DeepInfraCost-focused developers running high token volumes8.8
- 3Fireworks AIProduction teams that want to tune cost and speed per request8.8
- 4BasetenTeams serving both popular open models and their own models8.6
- 5GroqLatency-sensitive apps on GPT OSS models8.4
- 6CerebrasApps that need the highest tokens per second on gpt-oss-120B8.1
- 7SambaNova CloudTeams that want fast-hardware inference on a short model list8.1
- 8ModalEngineers deploying custom models and pipelines in Python8.0
- 9Amazon BedrockTeams already building on AWS7.8
- 10ReplicateDevelopers running image, video and niche community models7.6
How the scores work
Each product is rated out of 10 on the same three criteria, then ranked by the weighted total. Scores compare documented features and published prices, not hands-on testing.
- 35%Features
- 35%Ease of use
- 30%Value
No. 1, our pick
Together AIAn inference cloud for open-source models, with serverless per-token APIs, batch jobs, provisioned throughput, dedicated endpoints and fine-tuning.
8.9of 10Best for Developers who want one vendor from prototype to dedicated GPUs
- Features
- 9.3
- Ease of use
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Pay per token; gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens; dedicated H100 at $5.49 per GPU hour
Quoted from the Together AI pricing page on November 12, 2026:
gpt-oss-120B $0.15 $0.60
Together AI ranks first because it covers the whole path a team takes when serving open models. You start on serverless APIs that bill per token, with gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens and a catalog that spans chat, vision, image, video, speech, embeddings and rerank models. When traffic settles you can buy provisioned throughput units with an SLA, or move to dedicated single-tenant GPUs, listed at $5.49 per hour for an HGX H100 and $8.99 for an HGX B200. The API is compatible with the OpenAI REST API and SDKs, so most apps switch by changing the key and base URL. Fine-tuning and post-training sit on the same account, which helps teams that want to serve their own adapted model. The trade-offs are price premiums for US geo-pinned requests, sales-quoted pricing for newer hardware and per-job fine-tuning minimums.
Strengths
- +gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
- +Cached input pricing on many models, for example DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cached input at $0.006 per 1M tokens
- +Lists Ternary Bonsai 27B as a free serverless model
Drawbacks
- −US geo-pinned serverless requests cost more, for example GLM-5.3 rises from $1.40 to $1.75 per 1M input tokens
- −H200, B300 and NVL72 dedicated hardware is quoted by sales
- −Fine-tuning jobs carry minimum charges of $4 to $60 per job depending on the model
- gpt-oss-120B
- $0.15 input, $0.60 output per 1M tokens
- Dedicated H100
- $5.49 per GPU hour on demand
- API compatibility
- OpenAI REST API and SDKs
- Deployment options
- Serverless, batch, provisioned throughput, dedicated model and container inference
No. 2
DeepInfraA low-cost inference API for open models, billed per token for language models and per execution time for most others.
8.8of 10Best for Cost-focused developers running high token volumes
- Features
- 8.4
- Ease of use
- 8.7
- Value
- 9.4
Price
Pay per token with no contracts; DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens
Quoted from the DeepInfra pricing page on November 12, 2026:
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 1024k $0.06 / $0.015 cached $0.18
DeepInfra is the value pick in this list. Its pricing page shows some of the lowest token rates we found for popular open models: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 costs $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens with a 1024k context window, and GLM-5.3-Flash costs $0.15 and $0.50. Several models carried discounts when we checked, including 38% off GLM-5.3 and 51% off DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017. The chat completions API is OpenAI-compatible for every language model, so moving an existing app usually means changing the base URL, key and model name. Beyond serverless tokens, DeepInfra offers a Batch API, LoRA adapters, private custom LLM deployments and DGX B300 GPU rentals at $5.89 per instance-hour. It ranks below Together AI and Fireworks AI on features because it publishes fewer service tiers and compliance details, and promotional rates can change, so budget on list prices.
Strengths
- +DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at $0.06 input and $0.18 output per 1M tokens
- +No long-term contracts or upfront costs
- +Frequent model discounts, such as 38% off GLM-5.3 input when we checked
Drawbacks
- −Discounted rates are promotions and can change
- −Most non-language models are billed by execution time, which is harder to forecast
- −gpt-oss-120B is not on the main pricing page, so like-for-like comparison is harder
- Cheapest listed LLM
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, $0.06 input per 1M tokens
- Max context
- 1024k tokens on several models
- API
- OpenAI-compatible, plus Batch API
- GPU rental
- DGX B300 at $5.89 per instance-hour
No. 3
Fireworks AIA serverless and on-demand inference platform for open models, with per-request Standard, Priority, Fast, Batch and Spot modes.
8.8of 10Best for Production teams that want to tune cost and speed per request
- Features
- 9.2
- Ease of use
- 8.7
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Prepaid credits, pay per token from $0.05 per 1M input tokens; gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
Quoted from the Fireworks AI pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Serverless Pay per token · From $0.05 / 1M input tokens
Fireworks AI is the closest rival to Together AI and the stronger pick when you want fine control over each request. Every serverless call bills on input, cached input and output tokens, and you can switch between Standard, Priority, Fast, Batch and Spot modes on the same endpoint: Batch takes 50% off, Spot takes 30% off on best-effort capacity, and Fast targets 100+ tokens per second for interactive apps. gpt-oss-120B costs $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens, the cheapest listed model starts at $0.05 per 1M input tokens, and prompt caching is automatic with no write fee. Billing runs on prepaid credits with monthly spend limits. For steady traffic you can reserve throughput with a 99.9% uptime SLA or run On Demand GPUs billed per second. The compliance list is long, including zero data retention by default and HIPAA with a BAA. GPU rates are higher than some rivals, and Spot traffic needs retry logic.
Strengths
- +gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 input, $0.015 cached input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
- +Monthly spend limits and Auto Reload to keep production running
- +Reserved throughput overage bills at standard serverless rates, not a penalty rate
Drawbacks
- −Priority mode costs more, for example gpt-oss-120B input rises from $0.15 to $0.18
- −On Demand H100 at $8.00 per hour is higher than Together AI's and Baseten's listed rates
- −Spot capacity can drop to zero, so requests need a fallback
- Serverless from
- $0.05 per 1M input tokens
- Batch discount
- 50% off input and output
- On Demand H100
- $8.00 per hour, billed per GPU-second
- Compliance
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, 27701, 42001, HIPAA with a BAA
No. 4
BasetenAn inference platform with per-token Model APIs for open models and per-minute dedicated GPUs for custom models.
8.6of 10Best for Teams serving both popular open models and their own models
- Features
- 8.9
- Ease of use
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.8
Price
Pay as you go; GPT OSS 120B at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens; dedicated H100 at $6.50 per hour billed per minute
Quoted from the Baseten pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Model GPT OSS 120B Input $0.10 Cache input — Output $0.50
Baseten covers two jobs that many teams need at once. Model APIs serve popular open models per token, with GPT OSS 120B at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, the lowest rate for that model in this list, plus Fast variants of GLM and DeepSeek models for latency-sensitive work at a higher price. Dedicated Inference runs your own models on GPUs billed per minute, from a T4 at about $0.63 an hour to an H100 at $6.50 and a B200 at $9.98, and training uses the same rates. Baseten says each model is checked against the lab's published benchmarks and runs at the precision it publishes. Pay as you go needs no contract, while volume discounts, reserved compute and custom regions go through sales. Dedicated deployments need more setup than a serverless call, which is why it scores below the top three on ease of use.
Strengths
- +Lowest listed gpt-oss-120B price in this list at $0.10 input and $0.50 output
- +H100 MIG with 40 GiB at $3.75 per hour for smaller models
- +States that models run at the published precision with no silent downgrades
Drawbacks
- −Fast variants cost more, for example GLM-5.3 Fast at $2.10 input versus $1.40
- −Volume discounts and reserved compute require talking to sales
- −Dedicated deployments take more setup than calling a serverless endpoint
- GPT OSS 120B
- $0.10 input, $0.50 output per 1M tokens
- Dedicated H100
- $6.50 per hour, billed per minute
- Dedicated B200
- $9.98 per hour
- Billing
- Usage-based, no contracts on pay as you go
No. 5
GroqGroqCloud serves open models on Groq's LPU hardware through an OpenAI-compatible API built for low latency.
8.4of 10Best for Latency-sensitive apps on GPT OSS models
- Features
- 7.6
- Ease of use
- 9.0
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Free plan with rate limits; Developer plan pay per token, GPT OSS 20B at $0.075 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens
Quoted from the Groq pricing page on November 12, 2026:
GPT OSS 20B openai/gpt-oss-20b 1000 $0.075 input $0.30 output
Groq is the pick when response speed matters more than catalog size. GroqCloud runs models on Groq's own LPU hardware and documents about 1,000 tokens per second for GPT OSS 20B and about 500 for GPT OSS 120B. Prices are simple: GPT OSS 20B costs $0.075 per 1M input tokens and $0.30 per 1M output tokens, and GPT OSS 120B costs $0.15 and $0.60. There is a free plan with lower rate limits, and upgrading to the Developer tier only needs a payment method, with spend limits and budget alerts available. The API is OpenAI-compatible, and GPT OSS models get built-in browser search and code execution. The weak spot is the self-serve catalog: when we checked, only a handful of production language models were priced publicly, Llama 3.3 70B and Llama 3.1 8B were marked Enterprise, and dedicated capacity is sold through sales.
Strengths
- +Free plan to start, with an upgrade to pay-per-token Developer tier
- +GPT OSS 120B at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
- +Developer plan limits of 250K tokens and 1K requests per minute on GPT OSS models
Drawbacks
- −Small self-serve catalog: Llama 3.3 70B and Llama 3.1 8B are listed as Enterprise, Contact Sales
- −Preview models such as Qwen3.8-27B are not meant for production
- −No public pricing page for dedicated GroqMetal or GroqCore capacity
- GPT OSS 20B
- $0.075 input, $0.30 output per 1M tokens, about 1,000 tokens per second
- GPT OSS 120B
- $0.15 input, $0.60 output per 1M tokens, about 500 tokens per second
- Free plan
- Yes, with lower rate limits
- Data centers
- 13 across four continents
No. 6
CerebrasCerebras Inference runs open models on wafer-scale hardware, with a self-serve Developer tier and Enterprise capacity by quote.
8.1of 10Best for Apps that need the highest tokens per second on gpt-oss-120B
- Features
- 7.4
- Ease of use
- 8.9
- Value
- 8.0
Price
Self-serve pay as you go with a one-time $5 promotional credit; gpt-oss-120B at $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $0.75 per 1M output tokens
Quoted from the Cerebras pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Pricing: $0.35 per million input tokens, $0.75 per million output tokens.
Cerebras is the speed specialist. Its docs list about 3,000 tokens per second for gpt-oss-120B and about 1,850 for Qwen 3.8 27B, which is the highest documented output speed in this list. The self-serve Developer tier is pay as you go, with gpt-oss-120B at $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $0.75 per 1M output tokens, and a one-time $5 promotional credit when you add a payment method. Rate limits are generous on the paid tier at 1K requests and 1M input tokens per minute, while the free trial is capped at 5 requests per minute and 1M tokens a day. The catch is scope: only two models are available self-serve, and Cerebras describes the Developer tier as meant for development and evaluation, with production capacity, priority and custom weights on the quote-based Enterprise tier. Per token it costs more than GPU-based rivals for the same model.
Strengths
- +Fastest documented output speed in this list on gpt-oss-120B
- +One-time $5 promotional credit when you add a payment method, valid 30 days
- +No automatic enrollment in paid usage when the credit runs out
Drawbacks
- −Only two models on the self-serve Developer tier: GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B
- −Cerebras says the Developer tier is not intended for production use
- −gpt-oss-120B costs more than on Together AI, Fireworks AI, Groq or Baseten
- gpt-oss-120B
- $0.35 input, $0.75 output per 1M tokens, about 3,000 tokens per second
- Free trial limits
- 5 requests per minute, 1M tokens per day
- Developer tier limits
- 1K requests per minute, 1M input tokens per minute
- Enterprise
- Contact Cerebras for a quote
No. 7
SambaNova CloudSambaCloud serves open models on SambaNova's RDU dataflow hardware with pay-as-you-go token pricing.
8.1of 10Best for Teams that want fast-hardware inference on a short model list
- Features
- 7.5
- Ease of use
- 8.4
- Value
- 8.4
Price
Pay as you go per token after buying credits; gpt-oss-120b at $0.22 per 1M input tokens and $0.59 per 1M output tokens
Quoted from the SambaNova Cloud pricing page on November 12, 2026:
gpt-oss-120b N/A 0.22 USD 0.59 USD
SambaNova Cloud is a smaller alternative to Groq and Cerebras that also runs on custom silicon, SambaNova's RDU dataflow chips. The public pricing page listed five models when we checked, with gpt-oss-120b at $0.22 per 1M input tokens and $0.59 per 1M output tokens, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash at $0.30 and $1.20, and GLM-5.3 at $2.80 and $8.80, which is above GPU-based rivals for that model. The API is OpenAI-compatible and documents function calling, JSON mode, vision, embeddings and prompt caching, and custom checkpoints let you serve your own fine-tuned weights. Plans are simple: the Free plan needs a payment method and purchased credits, the Developer plan is pay as you go with standard rate limits, and Enterprise is a subscription with production limits and BYOC. The short catalog keeps it in the middle of the list.
Strengths
- +gpt-oss-120b output at $0.59 per 1M tokens, slightly below Together AI and Fireworks AI
- +Cached input pricing on GLM-5.3 and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- +Custom checkpoints let you run your own fine-tuned weights
Drawbacks
- −Short public model list compared with Together AI or DeepInfra
- −You must buy credits before the first request, even on the Free plan
- −Higher rate limits and BYOC require the subscription-based Enterprise plan
- gpt-oss-120b
- $0.22 input, $0.59 output per 1M tokens
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- $0.30 input, $1.20 output per 1M tokens
- Plans
- Free (credits), Developer (pay as you go), Enterprise (subscription)
- Hardware
- SambaNova RDU
No. 8
ModalA serverless compute platform that runs your own Python model code on GPUs billed per second, plus per-token model endpoints.
8.0of 10Best for Engineers deploying custom models and pipelines in Python
- Features
- 8.8
- Ease of use
- 7.4
- Value
- 7.8
Price
Starter plan $0 plus compute with $30 per month in free credits; GPUs billed per second from $0.000164 for an Nvidia T4; Team plan $250 per month plus compute
Quoted from the Modal pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Nvidia T4 $ 0.000164
Modal is a different kind of inference platform: instead of mainly calling a hosted model, you deploy your own Python code and Modal runs it on GPUs that start on demand and bill per second. Rates run from $0.000164 per second for an Nvidia T4 to $0.001097 for an H100 SXM5 and $0.001972 for a B300, and you never pay for idle resources. The $0 Starter plan includes $30 a month in compute credits, 3 seats and 10 GPU concurrency, and the Team plan costs $250 a month plus compute with $100 in credits and 50 GPU concurrency. Modal also sells per-token model endpoints for models such as Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3, plus sandboxes and training. It scores lower on ease of use than the serverless APIs above because you own the serving code, but for custom models, multi-step pipelines or unusual architectures that control is the point.
Strengths
- +$30 per month in free credits on the $0 Starter plan
- +Per-second billing with scale to zero for spiky inference
- +Full control over the serving stack for custom or fine-tuned models
Drawbacks
- −You write and maintain the serving code for custom models
- −Starter plan caps GPU concurrency at 10; the Team plan costs $250 per month plus compute
- −Its per-token endpoint list is shorter than Together AI's or DeepInfra's
- H100 SXM5
- $0.001097 per second
- Free credits
- $30 per month on Starter
- Team plan
- $250 per month plus compute, $100 in monthly credits, 50 GPU concurrency
- Billing
- Per second of CPU, GPU and memory use
No. 9
Amazon BedrockAWS's managed service for calling foundation models, including open-weight models from OpenAI, NVIDIA, Meta and others, inside an AWS account.
7.8of 10Best for Teams already building on AWS
- Features
- 8.6
- Ease of use
- 7.2
- Value
- 7.6
Price
Pay per token by model and region; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B at $0.18 per 1M input tokens and $0.78 per 1M output tokens on the Standard tier
Quoted from the Amazon Bedrock pricing page on November 12, 2026:
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B $ 0.18 $ 0.78
Amazon Bedrock makes sense when your application, data and security controls already live in AWS. It serves open-weight models such as gpt-oss-20b, gpt-oss-120b and NVIDIA Nemotron next to proprietary models, all billed per token through your AWS account and governed by IAM. The pricing page lists NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B at $0.18 per 1M input tokens and $0.78 per 1M output tokens on the Standard tier, and states that Flex and Batch tiers are 50% cheaper while Priority costs 75% more. Intelligent prompt routing can send each request to the model in a family that is predicted to answer best for the cost. The trade-offs are complexity and price discovery: rates vary by model and region, and onboarding through IAM and the console takes longer than signing up for an API key with Together AI or Groq. Open-model specialists usually list lower token prices for the same models.
Strengths
- +One AWS bill and IAM model for open and proprietary models
- +Batch and Flex tiers at half the Standard price
- +Regional deployment options for data residency
Drawbacks
- −Prices vary by model and region, which makes comparison slower
- −Priority tier costs 75% more than Standard
- −Setup through AWS IAM and the console takes longer than an API key signup
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- $0.18 input, $0.78 output per 1M tokens
- Batch and Flex
- 50% off Standard tier pricing
- Priority
- 75% premium over Standard
- Billing
- Through your AWS account
No. 10
ReplicateA platform for running thousands of community and proprietary models through an API, billed by hardware time or by input and output.
7.6of 10Best for Developers running image, video and niche community models
- Features
- 7.8
- Ease of use
- 8.0
- Value
- 7.0
Price
Pay for what you use; public models billed per second of hardware or per input and output; Nvidia T4 at $0.000225 per second; deepseek-r1 at $3.75 per 1M input tokens
Quoted from the Replicate pricing page on November 12, 2026:
Nvidia T4 GPU gpu-t4 $ 0.000225 /sec $ 0.81 /hr
Replicate is the broadest catalog in this list but the weakest fit for low-latency, per-token LLM serving. Thousands of community-contributed and proprietary models run through one API, and most are billed by the second of hardware time, from $0.000225 per second on an Nvidia T4 to $0.001525 on an H100. Some models are billed per input and output instead, and each model page shows a cost estimate. You can deploy your own models with Cog, Replicate's open-source packaging tool, and deployments scale up and down automatically. The costs to watch are on private models: most run on dedicated hardware and bill for setup and idle time as well as active time, except fast booting fine-tunes. Token prices on popular LLMs, such as deepseek-r1 at $3.75 per 1M input tokens, are well above the specialists, which is why Replicate ranks last for this audience.
Strengths
- +Very large catalog of image, video and audio models
- +Per-model cost estimates shown on each model page
- +Nvidia H100 at $5.49 per hour, billed per second
Drawbacks
- −Private models are billed for setup and idle time as well as active time
- −Per-token LLM pricing is less competitive, for example deepseek-r1 at $3.75 per 1M input tokens
- −Multi-GPU A100, H100 and H200 capacity beyond 1x often requires committed spend
- Nvidia T4
- $0.000225 per second, $0.81 per hour
- Nvidia H100
- $0.001525 per second, $5.49 per hour
- Custom models
- Packaged with Cog
- Billing
- Hardware time or per input and output, depending on the model
What to check before you buy
Compare the same model across vendors
Token prices only mean something for the same model at the same precision. gpt-oss-120B costs $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens on Together AI, Fireworks AI and Groq, $0.10 and $0.50 on Baseten, $0.22 and $0.59 on SambaNova Cloud and $0.35 and $0.75 on Cerebras. Price your real traffic mix of input, cached input and output tokens before you choose.
Decide how much speed you need
Latency-sensitive apps such as voice agents and coding tools benefit from fast hardware. Cerebras documents about 3,000 tokens per second for gpt-oss-120B and Groq about 1,000 for GPT OSS 20B, while Fireworks AI sells a Fast mode with 100+ tokens per second. Batch jobs that can wait are cheaper: Fireworks AI and Amazon Bedrock both list 50% off for batch.
Plan the move from serverless to dedicated
Serverless per-token pricing suits spiky traffic, but steady high volume is often cheaper on dedicated GPUs. Together AI lists dedicated H100s at $5.49 per GPU hour, Baseten bills H100s at $6.50 an hour by the minute, Fireworks AI bills H100s at $8.00 an hour by the second, and Modal bills an H100 at $0.001097 per second. Check whether idle time is billed: Replicate bills private models for setup and idle time.
Check rate limits and model lifecycle
Free and entry tiers come with tight limits. Cerebras' free trial allows 5 requests per minute and 1M tokens a day, while Groq's Developer plan lists 250K tokens and 1K requests per minute on GPT OSS models. Preview models can be withdrawn at short notice, so pin production traffic to models the vendor labels as production.
Confirm compatibility and compliance
Together AI, DeepInfra, Groq, Cerebras and SambaNova Cloud all document OpenAI-compatible APIs, so switching mostly means changing the base URL and key. If you handle sensitive data, look for zero data retention and certifications: Fireworks AI lists zero data retention by default, SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA with a BAA.
Common questions
- What is the best AI inference platform for open models?
- Together AI is the best AI inference platform for most developers serving open models in 2026. It offers serverless per-token APIs, batch, provisioned throughput and dedicated H100s at $5.49 per GPU hour, with gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 per 1M input tokens.
- What is the cheapest AI inference API?
- DeepInfra had the lowest listed rate we found, with DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens as of November 2026. For gpt-oss-120B specifically, Baseten lists the lowest price at $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens.
- Which inference provider is the fastest?
- Cerebras documents the highest speed in this list, about 3,000 tokens per second on gpt-oss-120B. Groq documents about 1,000 tokens per second on GPT OSS 20B and about 500 on GPT OSS 120B.
- How much does it cost to run gpt-oss-120B through an API?
- Between $0.10 and $0.35 per 1M input tokens as of November 2026. Baseten charges $0.10 input and $0.50 output, Together AI, Fireworks AI and Groq charge $0.15 and $0.60, SambaNova Cloud charges $0.22 and $0.59, and Cerebras charges $0.35 and $0.75.
- Should I use serverless inference or dedicated GPUs?
- Start serverless and move to dedicated GPUs once traffic is steady and high. Serverless bills only per token, while dedicated GPUs bill by time, for example an H100 at $5.49 per hour on Together AI or $6.50 per hour on Baseten, and usually cost less per token only at high utilization.
- Are these inference APIs compatible with the OpenAI SDK?
- Yes, most of them are. Together AI, DeepInfra, Groq, Cerebras and SambaNova Cloud all document OpenAI-compatible APIs, so you usually change only the base URL, API key and model name.
- Is there a free AI inference API?
- Yes, Groq has a free plan with lower rate limits, and Modal's Starter plan includes $30 a month in compute credits. Cerebras gives a one-time $5 promotional credit valid for 30 days, and Together AI lists Ternary Bonsai 27B as a free serverless model.
Questions or corrections: editorial@toptooladvisor.com
See our disclosure and editorial policy. Vendors update prices without notice, so confirm on their site first.