9 Best Resource Management Software of 2026
By the TopToolAdvisor research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · Next review December 24, 2026 · 9 products scored
Our pick in brief
Float is the most complete self-serve scheduler for client services: resource scheduling, capacity, time off and project scoping start at $7 a person, and Pro adds time tracking, rate cards and margin dashboards. Resource Guru is the easiest to roll out and has the cheapest entry plan, though reports start on its second tier. Runn is the pick for firms that plan with tentative projects, scenarios and utilization charts. Productive and Teamdeck suit smaller agencies, Productive because budgets and billing sit next to the schedule and Teamdeck because light seats are cheap. Kantata, Smartsheet Resource Management, Mosaic and Saviom are sales-led platforms for larger firms that need forecasting, skills matching and governance at scale.
Quick answer
Float is the best resource management software for agencies and consultancies scheduling people across client projects in 2026, from $7 per scheduled person a month billed annually; Resource Guru suits teams that want the simplest scheduler, from $5 per person a month or $4.16 billed annually. Teamdeck has the lowest seat price at $1.80 a month for light members who only appear on the schedule, billed yearly.
This list is for services firms that sell people's time: agencies, consultancies, architecture and engineering practices and IT services teams that need to see who is free, book them onto projects and track utilization against a target. We compared documented features and published prices for 9 products and scored each on features, ease of use and value, looking hardest at scheduling, capacity views, tentative work, time tracking against the plan and utilization reporting. Prices are the cheapest paid plan in US dollars as shown on the vendor's own pricing page on the date we checked. Where a vendor only quotes on request, the price is marked as pending.
By the numbers
- 37%In the same 2025 PMI study, 37% of projects only partly delivered the expected results and 13% failed outright.Source: Project Management Institute
- 36%Only 36% of organizations in Wellingtone's 2026 State of Project Management survey of project and portfolio practitioners always or mostly complete projects on time.Source: Wellingtone
- 31%31% of complex projects failed to achieve the full scope of their intended benefits in PMI's 2026 research, more than twice the rate for projects overall.Source: Project Management Institute
- 25%Leaders and teams spend 25% of their time just searching for answers, according to Atlassian's 2025 State of Teams survey of 12,000 knowledge workers and 200 executives.Source: Atlassian
- 2 minutesMicrosoft 365 telemetry for 2025 shows employees are interrupted every 2 minutes on average by a meeting, email or notification.Source: Microsoft
- 6%89% of executives in Atlassian's 2026 survey say AI increases speed, but only 6% are sure they have clear examples of organization-wide AI return on investment.Source: Atlassian
Shortlist scores
- 1FloatAgencies, studios and consultancies that schedule people across client projects and want utilization and margin in the same tool.8.8
- 2Resource GuruAgencies, consultancies and engineering teams that want an easy scheduler with clash management and the lowest entry price.8.8
- 3RunnIT services, software, consulting and architecture firms that plan tentative work, compare scenarios and report on utilization and bench time.8.7
- 4ProductiveAgencies and consultancies that want resource planning, project delivery and financials in one system rather than a standalone scheduler.8.5
- 5TeamdeckCreative agencies and IT companies that schedule many freelancers or crew who never need to log in.8.5
- 6KantataMid-size and large consultancies, IT services firms and agencies that need resourcing tied to project financials and forecasting.8.0
- 7MosaicArchitecture, engineering and consulting firms of 100 or more people that want a managed rollout and ERP integration.7.9
- 8Smartsheet Resource ManagementOrganizations already running projects in Smartsheet that want resource planning on the same platform.7.9
- 9SaviomMedium to large organizations with complex, multi-location resource pools and strict governance needs.7.8
How the scores work
Each product is rated out of 10 on the same three criteria, then ranked by the weighted total. Scores compare documented features and published prices, not hands-on testing.
- 35%Features
- 35%Ease of use
- 30%Value
No. 1, our pick
FloatResource scheduling and capacity planning software for professional services teams, with time tracking and project financials on its Pro plan.
8.8of 10Best for Agencies, studios and consultancies that schedule people across client projects and want utilization and margin in the same tool.
- Features
- 8.8
- Ease of use
- 9.0
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Starter from $7 per scheduled person per month billed annually; Pro $12 adds time tracking and rate cards
Quoted from the Float pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Allocate work efficiently $ 7 00 USD per scheduled person/month
Float takes first place because it covers the full resourcing loop for a services firm while staying simple to run. Starter at $7 per scheduled person a month, billed annually, includes resource scheduling, capacity and time off management, project scoping, role suggestions and API access, which is enough for a studio that only needs to see who is booked. Pro at $12 is the plan most firms will end up on: it adds time tracking with prefilled timesheets, client rate cards in multiple currencies, project cost estimation, advanced reporting with live dashboards and SSO. That is where utilization trends, billable versus non-billable comparisons and project margin tracking come together. Only people on the schedule are billed, and anyone else can log in as a free guest. The limits are modest: there is no free plan, Starter has one placeholder, and onboarding help and SLAs sit on the sales-led Enterprise plan.
Strengths
- +Only scheduled people are billed, and guests can view the schedule for free
- +30-day trial of the Pro plan with no credit card
- +Google and Outlook calendar, Slack and Zapier integrations plus API access
Drawbacks
- −No permanent free plan
- −Time tracking and margin reporting need the Pro plan
- −Starter includes only 1 placeholder
- Plans
- Starter, Pro and Enterprise
- Billing basis
- Per scheduled person
- Free trial
- 30 days on Pro, no credit card
- Customers
- 4,500+ professional services teams, per Float
No. 2
Resource GuruA fast resource scheduling tool for people, equipment and meeting rooms, with timesheets and reports on its mid-tier plan.
8.8of 10Best for Agencies, consultancies and engineering teams that want an easy scheduler with clash management and the lowest entry price.
- Features
- 8.2
- Ease of use
- 9.1
- Value
- 9.0
Price
Grasshopper from $5 per person per month billed monthly, $4.16 billed annually; Blackbelt $8 adds timesheets and reports
Quoted from the Resource Guru pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Grasshopper The essentials without reports $5
Resource Guru ranks second because it is the quickest way for a services team to get a shared, clash-free schedule, and its pricing is easy to predict. Grasshopper costs $5 per person a month, or $4.16 on annual billing, and covers unlimited projects and clients, tentative and repeat bookings, time zone support, leave management and calendar sync. Equipment and meeting rooms can be booked as non-human resources at half the per-person rate. Most firms that report on utilization will need Blackbelt at $8, which adds weekly timesheets, forecast versus actuals, customizable reports, project rates and budgets. Master at $12 adds approval workflow, SSO, unlimited history and phone support. The trade-offs are that every person in the account is billed regardless of whether they log in, and financial depth stops at project rates and budgets, so firms that need margin forecasting will look higher up the list or at a PSA.
Strengths
- +Lowest published entry price on this list for a full login seat
- +Annual plans come with 2 months free
- +Non-human resources cost half the per-person rate
Drawbacks
- −Reports, timesheets and project budgets are not on Grasshopper
- −Every person on the account is billed, whether or not they log in
- −Phone support only on the Master plan
- Plans
- Grasshopper, Blackbelt, Master and Enterprise
- Free placeholders
- 1, 5 or 10 depending on plan
- Currency
- USD by default, GBP on request
- Compliance
- GDPR and SOC 2 Type II
No. 3
RunnResource management and capacity planning software for teams planning people across technical and client projects.
8.7of 10Best for IT services, software, consulting and architecture firms that plan tentative work, compare scenarios and report on utilization and bench time.
- Features
- 8.7
- Ease of use
- 8.7
- Value
- 8.6
Price
Lite from $7 per resource seat per month; Standard, the self-serve plan, $11 per resource seat
Quoted from the Runn pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Lite Core essentials for getting started. $ 7 USD Per resource seat /month
Runn earns third place for its planning depth at a published price. Every plan includes scheduling, tentative projects, unlimited placeholders, skills and tags, capacity and utilization charts, project budgets, rate cards, planned versus actuals and bench reporting, so even Lite at $7 per resource seat a month gives a services firm a forward view of who is idle. Standard at $11 is the plan you can buy yourself: it adds timesheets, five custom fields, out-of-the-box integrations, an API, utilization insights and budget by phase. Advanced, priced on request, adds workstreams, resource requests, SmartMatch AI in beta, SAML SSO and unlimited saved scenarios. Seats are counted by resources on the planner rather than login users, which suits firms where few people plan and many are planned. The catches are that Lite has to be requested from Runn, and the Harvest and Clockify integrations are only on Advanced.
Strengths
- +Seats are counted per resource, not per user who logs in
- +Unlimited placeholders are included at no extra charge
- +30-day Standard trial with no credit card
Drawbacks
- −Timesheets and integrations need Standard
- −Lite and Advanced are bought through Runn rather than self-serve
- −Resource requests and SAML SSO sit on the custom-priced Advanced plan
- Plans
- Lite, Standard and Advanced
- Billing basis
- Per resource seat
- Free trial
- 30 days on Standard
- Security
- SOC 2 certified, per Runn
No. 4
ProductiveAgency management software that connects resource planning with budgets, time tracking, billing and profitability.
8.5of 10Best for Agencies and consultancies that want resource planning, project delivery and financials in one system rather than a standalone scheduler.
- Features
- 9.1
- Ease of use
- 8.2
- Value
- 8.3
Price
Essential from $10 per user per month billed yearly; Professional adds rate cards, skills and recurring budgets
Quoted from the Productive pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Essential $10 per month - billed yearly
Productive ranks fourth because it is the most complete option here for a firm that wants scheduling and profitability in one place, though it asks more of the team than a pure scheduler. Essential at $10 per user a month, billed yearly, already includes resource planning, budgeting, project and task management, time tracking, time off management, expenses, reporting and API access. Professional adds rate cards, skills, recurring budgets for retainers, billable time approvals, a time off approval flow and HRIS and invoicing integrations. Ultimate adds revenue forecasting, a Scenario Builder for testing project scenarios and multiple subsidiaries. The cost of that breadth is setup: teams have to adopt Productive for projects and time, not only for the schedule, and per-user pricing adds up when many staff only need to be scheduled. For an agency replacing several tools at once, that trade is often worth it.
Strengths
- +Resource planning sits next to budgets, so utilization ties to profit
- +Time off management feeds capacity from the cheapest plan
- +14-day trial with no credit card
Drawbacks
- −Priced per user, so it costs more than a standalone scheduler for view-only staff
- −Skills and rate cards need Professional
- −Revenue forecasting and scenarios sit on Ultimate, priced through sales
- Plans
- Essential, Professional and Ultimate
- Free trial
- 14 days, no credit card
- Custom fields
- 5 on Essential, 15 on Professional
- Integrations
- HRIS and invoicing on Professional, HubSpot on Ultimate
No. 5
TeamdeckResource scheduling, timesheets, leave and reporting in one tool, priced by seat type with every feature included.
8.5of 10Best for Creative agencies and IT companies that schedule many freelancers or crew who never need to log in.
- Features
- 7.8
- Ease of use
- 8.6
- Value
- 9.3
Price
Full Member $5.40 per person per month billed yearly ($6 monthly); Light Member seats $1.80 yearly
Quoted from the Teamdeck pricing page on November 9, 2026:
Full Member $5.40 Monthly : $6 / person / month
Teamdeck places fifth and scores highest on value because its seat model fits firms with a large pool of people to schedule but few planners. A Full Member costs $5.40 a month on yearly billing, or $6 monthly, and gets full access to scheduling, timesheets, leave, reports, notifications, the mobile app and Google or Outlook calendar sync. A Light Member costs $1.80 a month on yearly billing and appears on the calendar and in reports without a login, which suits freelancers, contractors or field crews who are booked but do not log hours themselves. Teamdeck does not gate features by plan, so utilization, budget and payroll reports are available from the first seat. It scores lower on features than Float or Runn because it has less on project financials and forecasting, and anyone who needs to log time must be on a full seat.
Strengths
- +Light Member seats at $1.80 a month keep people on the schedule cheaply
- +Every feature is included on every paid seat
- +14-day trial with no credit card
Drawbacks
- −Light members cannot log in, log time or use the mobile app
- −No permanent free plan
- −Dedicated account management and SLAs need the custom Enterprise plan
- Seat types
- Light Member and Full Member, plus Enterprise
- Annual discount
- 10% on yearly billing
- Free trial
- 14 days, no credit card
- Feature gating
- None, every feature on every paid seat
No. 6
KantataA professional services automation platform with resource forecasting, skills-based staffing and financial management for services firms.
8.0of 10Best for Mid-size and large consultancies, IT services firms and agencies that need resourcing tied to project financials and forecasting.
- Features
- 9.3
- Ease of use
- 7.4
- Value
- 7.2
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending); plans are quoted by Kantata's PSA advisors
We could not confirm a US price yet. Check the Kantata pricing page.
Kantata ranks sixth because it offers the deepest resourcing inside a full professional services automation platform, with the cost and complexity that implies. Its resource management covers demand planning from the project pipeline, intelligent resource recommendations, comparing multiple resource plans at once and seeing how allocation decisions affect performance and profit. A skills inventory surfaces gaps before they hit projects, and external contractors can be added with their own roles, calendars, cost rates and availability, so staffing decisions cover the whole talent network. Because Kantata is a PSA, time tracking, utilization, expenses and financial management sit in the same system, and a version runs on Salesforce. The trade-offs are that pricing is quoted only after a conversation with Kantata's advisors and that adopting a PSA is a larger project than turning on a scheduler. It suits firms where utilization is a board-level number.
Strengths
- +Resourcing decisions are shown against performance and profit
- +Handles internal staff and external partners in one talent pool
- +Integrates with CRM, HR and financial systems, with a Salesforce version
Drawbacks
- −No published prices
- −A full PSA takes longer to set up than a standalone scheduler
- −No self-serve trial on the pricing page
- Product type
- Professional services automation (PSA)
- Pricing
- Tailored by company size and goals
- Platform options
- Kantata PSA and Kantata on Salesforce
- Integrations
- PSA, CRM, HR and financial systems, plus MCP connectivity
No. 7
MosaicAI-assisted resource planning, workload and forecasting software for professional services firms, sold with onboarding and customer success.
7.9of 10Best for Architecture, engineering and consulting firms of 100 or more people that want a managed rollout and ERP integration.
- Features
- 8.7
- Ease of use
- 7.8
- Value
- 7.0
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending); per seat billed annually plus a platform fee
We could not confirm a US price yet. Check the Mosaic pricing page.
Mosaic ranks eighth because it is a full-featured planning platform sold as a managed service, which suits larger firms more than small teams. Both the Standard and Enterprise plans include every feature: planning, workload, staffing, budgets, reports, revenue and headcount forecasting, enterprise security and Chello, Mosaic's AI assistant, which answers questions about people, projects and budgets, sends scheduled briefs and can draft a first plan from a proposal. Mosaic maintains a native ERP integration, and the subscription includes onboarding, training and a Customer Success Manager. Enterprise doubles the consultation hours and adds a senior success team and skills library help. The costs are layered: seats billed annually, an annual platform fee, ERP integration and a one-time implementation fee, none of them published. On Standard, SSO and two-factor authentication are an add-on. Firms of 100 people or more that want a guided rollout will get the most from it.
Strengths
- +Both plans include every feature for everyone in the firm
- +Onboarding, training and a Customer Success Manager come with the subscription
- +Per-seat rate steps down as headcount increases
Drawbacks
- −No published prices and a separate one-time implementation cost
- −Annual platform fee on top of seats
- −SSO and two-factor authentication are an add-on on Standard
- Plans
- Standard and Enterprise
- Billing
- Per seat, annually, plus an annual platform fee
- AI assistant
- Chello Base included, Chello Pro add-on at $50 per user a month
- Guarantee
- 5x ROI money-back guarantee available, per Mosaic
No. 8
Smartsheet Resource ManagementA resource scheduling and capacity add-on for Smartsheet, with heatmaps, time tracking, scenario planning and hiring forecasts.
7.9of 10Best for Organizations already running projects in Smartsheet that want resource planning on the same platform.
- Features
- 8.3
- Ease of use
- 8.0
- Value
- 7.4
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending); sold as an add-on to Smartsheet Business and Enterprise
We could not confirm a US price yet. Check the Smartsheet Resource Management pricing page.
Smartsheet Resource Management ranks seventh because it is a capable scheduler that makes most sense for teams already committed to Smartsheet. It gives resource managers one place to see who is available and what people are working on, with workload views across teams and individuals to spot people who are over or under allocated. Time tracking feeds back into project estimates, and hiring forecasts help plan for skill gaps. Scenario planning lets managers compare what-if options and apply one without touching live plans, and on Enterprise those scenarios can use placeholders, roles and disciplines. The limits are commercial: Resource Management is sold only as an add-on to Smartsheet's Business and Enterprise plans and its price is not published, so the total cost depends on your Smartsheet contract. A services firm that does not use Smartsheet for projects will find simpler and cheaper standalone tools above it.
Strengths
- +Fits teams that already plan projects in Smartsheet
- +Matches people by skills, availability and interests
- +What-if scenarios can be compared without touching live plans
Drawbacks
- −Only available as an add-on to Business or Enterprise plans
- −No published add-on price
- −Placeholders, roles and disciplines in scenarios need Enterprise
- Eligible plans
- Smartsheet Business and Enterprise
- Sold as
- Add-on
- Scenario planning
- Yes, extended on Enterprise
- Time tracking
- Included
Visit smartsheet.com|See the Smartsheet Resource Management profile
No. 9
SaviomConfigurable enterprise resource management software covering forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, utilization and resource financials.
7.8of 10Best for Medium to large organizations with complex, multi-location resource pools and strict governance needs.
- Features
- 8.9
- Ease of use
- 7.1
- Value
- 7.2
Price
See vendor pricing (USD check pending); quotes based on Power and Lite licenses
We could not confirm a US price yet. Check the Saviom pricing page.
Saviom ranks ninth on this list, not for lack of capability but because it is built for complex enterprise resource pools and is the slowest to adopt. Its resource management covers the whole lifecycle: confirmed and probability-weighted demand forecasts, capacity planning by role, skill, team or location, what-if workforce scenarios, skills-based matching with conflict detection, utilization and bench management, and cost, revenue and margin forecasting with cost and bill rates. Almost everything is configurable, from roles and fields to workflows, portals and permissions, and AI alerts flag emerging issues inside those workflows. Licensing is unusual: you pay for Power licenses for editors and Lite licenses for viewers, while people who are only scheduled are non-users with no license cost, so the quote does not rise with headcount. Prices are not published, and a 60-day trial is booked through Saviom. Smaller services firms will be better served by the self-serve tools higher up.
Strengths
- +Non-user licenses let you schedule unlimited people at no license cost
- +Highly configurable roles, fields, workflows, dashboards and permissions
- +60-day free trial available on request
Drawbacks
- −No published prices
- −Configurability means a longer implementation
- −Built for medium to large organizations rather than small teams
- License types
- Power, Lite and Non-User
- Free trial
- 60 days, booked with Saviom
- Experience
- 25+ years in resource management, per Saviom
- Reach
- Customers in 50+ countries, per Saviom
What to check before you buy
Know who you pay for
Pricing models differ more than headline prices. Float charges per scheduled person and lets others view the schedule as free guests. Resource Guru and Runn charge for every resource on the planner, whether or not they log in. Teamdeck splits full members at $5.40 from light members at $1.80, billed yearly. Saviom licenses only the people who edit or view, and Mosaic prices per seat with a rate that steps down as headcount grows.
Decide whether time tracking must sit next to the plan
Utilization is only as good as the actuals you compare against. Float adds time tracking on Pro, Resource Guru adds timesheets on Blackbelt and Runn adds timesheets on Standard. Productive and Teamdeck include time tracking on every paid seat. If you already log hours elsewhere, check the integrations before paying for a higher tier.
Plan for tentative work and placeholders
Services firms staff deals before they close. Runn includes tentative projects and unlimited placeholders on every plan, Resource Guru supports tentative bookings and gives 1 to 10 free placeholders by plan, and Float includes 1 placeholder on Starter and 5 on Pro. Kantata, Saviom and Mosaic add pipeline demand and probability-weighted forecasts for larger firms.
Match the tool to your size
Float, Resource Guru, Runn, Productive and Teamdeck publish prices and offer free trials of 14 to 30 days, so a small or mid-size firm can test them on real projects before paying. Kantata, Mosaic and Saviom quote on request and scope onboarding and implementation separately, and Smartsheet Resource Management is an add-on for Smartsheet's Business and Enterprise plans.
Check what utilization reporting covers
Look for billable versus non-billable splits, planned versus actual hours and bench reporting. Float shows utilization trends and billable comparisons, Resource Guru compares forecast against actuals, Runn has bench reporting on every plan and Saviom forecasts utilization and bench capacity.
Common questions
- What is the best resource management software?
- Float ranks first in our comparison for services firms because it combines resource scheduling, capacity, time off and project scoping from $7 per scheduled person a month billed annually, with time tracking and margin dashboards on Pro at $12. Resource Guru is second for teams that want the simplest scheduler, and Runn is third for firms that plan tentative work.
- What is the cheapest resource management software?
- Resource Guru Grasshopper costs $5 per person a month, or $4.16 billed annually, and is the cheapest full login seat here. Teamdeck charges $5.40 per full member and $1.80 per light member a month on yearly billing, which makes it the lowest cost way to put many people on a schedule.
- How is resource management software different from project management software?
- Project management tools organize tasks and deadlines, while resource management tools show who is available, book people across projects and measure utilization. Tools such as Productive and Kantata do both, while Float, Resource Guru, Runn and Teamdeck focus on scheduling and capacity and integrate with project tools.
- Which tools track utilization against a target?
- Float reports utilization trends and billable versus non-billable time, Runn includes utilization charts and bench reporting on every plan, Resource Guru compares forecast with actuals on Blackbelt and Saviom forecasts utilization and bench capacity. Accurate utilization needs tracked time, so check which plan includes timesheets.
- How did we rank these tools?
- We compared documented features and published prices on each vendor's own site and scored every product on features, ease of use and value. The overall score is a weighted average: features 35%, ease of use 35% and value 30%. Prices are the cheapest paid plan in US dollars on the date we checked.
Questions or corrections: editorial@toptooladvisor.com
No affiliate links and no paid placement; see our disclosure and editorial policy. Vendors update prices without notice, so confirm on their site first.